link

But such geoengineering may be “economically, socially and institutionally infeasible,” according to a draft obtained by Reuters covering hundreds of pages on risks of droughts, floods, heat waves and more powerful storms. Allen said he was giving his personal views, not of the IPCC draft of which he is an author. A halt after several years could lead to a jump in temperatures because greenhouse gases would continue to build up in the atmosphere.. “To deploy it safely would take many decades,” said Myles Allen, a professor of geosystem science at Oxford University.United Nations has reviewed the idea of creating a &wholesale Air spray gun039;sunshade' using sun-dimming chemicals.And it “would result in an ‘addiction problem’; once started, it’s hard to stop,” the draft says.7 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial times, is due for publication in October.5 degrees Celsius (2.The draft also # says rising temperatures could breach 1. He said it was “completely misleading” to suggest it could be an easy short-cut to slow warming.But many scientists are sceptical. The idea of spraying a haze of sun-dimming chemicals high above the Earth as a quick way to slow global warming faces so many obstacles that it may not be feasible, a leaked draft UN report says.The draft, by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) about ways to limit warming to 1. Then we will be able to write informed assessments,” he wrote in an e-mail.5C by mid-century unless governments take unprecedented action.

The UN review of a planetary sunshade, mimicking how a big volcanic eruption can cool the planet with a veil of debris, is part of a broad study of climate technologies ordered by almost 200 nations in the 2015 Paris Agreement. David Keith, faculty director of Harvard University’s Solar Geoengineering Research Program which is working for a tiny outdoor experiment to dim sunshine, said there was a misguided “taboo” against examining the technology. Problems involved with “solar radiation management” include testing and working out rules for a technology that could be deployed by a single nation, or even a company, and might disrupt global weather patterns. A halt after several years could lead to a jump in temperatures because greenhouse gases would continue to build up in the atmosphere.“We need a serious research effort to understand its risks and potential benefits. Given the long time needed for research, it would be better to focus on ways to limit greenhouse emissions, he said. It could still change substantially, the IPCC said. The Paris Agreement has been weakened by US President Donald Trump’s plan to withdraw.Proposals by some scientists to spray chemicals such as sulphur high in the atmosphere from aeroplanes have won more attention since Paris as a relatively cheap fix, costing perhaps $1 billion to $10 billion a year.